Business Environment Vs. Affairs of the State: Ideological State of Developing Countries

With business (private or public) - as human resource strategy - we look to invest in people who will influence mass via sciences that look to shape other resources into tangible utility for mass insertion.

Politics on the otherhand (for the most part) looks to exude respective influence on mass so as to bring about results that will attain predetermined utility of principalities.
Referring back to my 'external anomalies of the social organs' extract, throwing resources at political schemes is with the outlook to attain mass influence or fealty.

In politically fueled environments, legion is key! Most developing economies skew towards affiliations where looking to gather momentum and attain influence - with that - it has become custom to invest in local peoples through their need to believe and or belong rather than conclusive sciences that will derive results.

As business is coordinated by both private and public sector, utility sought for within the capacity of politics and policy tends to be rooted in affairs of the state.

At its simplest - where looking for an antithesis to disharmonies - we seek to adress what bought about disharmonious state and what dictates it?

Conclusively, Rome wasn't built in a day - as its ideological state still dictate affairs.

Be it Rome, Greece, Mesopotamia etc. certain ideals still shape global states of affairs to date, such states which supercede conventional political terms and derives advancement for its bearers.

Business strategy moreso embodies this capacity by doing the bidding that will appeal to the mass via insertion of market offering - with strategic vantage (vision) that states out to supercede short term objective and environmental forces. The mission all together though (in attainment of respective vision) is sold separately.